A new study by researchers at UC Berkeley and elsewhere reveals that after excise taxes have been positioned on sugary drinks, purchases declined dramatically and steadily throughout 5 American cities. The findings have been revealed in JAMA Well being Discussion board.
Though different research have evaluated the influence of beverage excise taxes—taxes on a per ounce foundation–in a single metropolis, this is without doubt one of the first that estimates the influence of native excise taxes on purchases and costs of sugar-sweetened drinks throughout a number of massive cities. The cities included Boulder, Philadelphia, Oakland, Seattle, and San Francisco, all of which carried out taxes between January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2018.
Sugar-sweetened drinks—comparable to sodas, fruit drinks, sports activities drinks, power drinks, and sweetened espresso drinks—are the main supply of added sugars within the American weight loss program, in keeping with the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention. They’re related to severe unfavourable well being outcomes, together with kind 2 diabetes, weight problems, coronary heart illness, kidney illness, non-alcoholic liver illness, gum illness, tooth decay, and different situations.
Taxes on some of these drinks are promoted as a key coverage to carry beverage corporations accountable for and cut back the well being harms related to their merchandise, however complete analyses of such taxes have been tough because of the absence of sufficiently massive samples of knowledge and methodological limitations.
“Estimating a extra normal, extra correct influence of native sugar-sweetened beverage taxes within the US gives larger perception into the general effectiveness of those taxes,” mentioned examine lead creator, Scott Kaplan, who’s an economics professor at the USA Naval Academy. Kaplan obtained his Ph.D. from the UC Berkeley Division of Agricultural and Useful resource Economics in 2021. “This examine could higher inform the potential effectiveness of SSB taxes on the state or federal degree.”
This new examine builds on an earlier examine that regarded solely at information from town of Oakland.
The brand new examine discovered that retail costs of sugar-sweetened drinks elevated by 33.1% over the 2 years following tax implementation in every metropolis studied, and that there was a corresponding lower in purchases of 33% over the identical timeframe. The value improve and buy decreases appeared instantly after the taxes have been carried out and continued to be sustained months later.
On the identical time, there was no proof that buyers have been touring to bordering areas with out sweetened beverage taxes to make purchases there.
This examine’s findings counsel that “these taxes are fairly efficient by way of well being outcomes and societal cost-savings,” mentioned Kaplan. He hopes this may occasionally result in comparable coverage motion in different places throughout the nation, and on the state and nationwide ranges, as was completed with tobacco taxes.
A previous study co-authored by Dr. Kristine A. Madsen of UC Berkeley College of Public Well being confirmed that tax income from sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise in seven cities have been used to help initiatives to enhance group well being, develop human and group capital, and advance fairness.
Extra info:
Scott Kaplan et al, Analysis of Modifications in Costs and Purchases Following Implementation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes Throughout the US, JAMA Well being Discussion board (2024). DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4737
Quotation:
Taxes on sugar-sweetened drinks drive decline in consumption: Research (2024, January 11)
retrieved 13 January 2024
from https://medicalxpress.com/information/2024-01-taxes-sugar-sweetened-decline-consumption.html
This doc is topic to copyright. Other than any truthful dealing for the aim of personal examine or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is supplied for info functions solely.